I presume you do realize the number of people who have died in this tragedy and the utter devastation to their countries? "Humor" seems a bit misplaced.
Well, TBH I'm on crappy dialup at my parents at the moment, and so am only skimming LJ. So I only read the REALLY BIG LETTERS in a hurry, and thus had no idea what it was about anyway.
But I'm dubious about the notion that "humour is misplaced" in tragedies... If I had more time on line I'd think up a coherant argument, but as it s I'll just point out that I'm musing on the old cliche "if you didn't laugh, you'd cry" and while I haven't reached any conclusions in this case most human lives that have been hit by tragedy move on most effectively by the power of laughter - it's long been a coping mechanism for terrible things (hence the horrible need to nervously laugh when finding out people are dead, etc)
I wonder if you've read the book Diana's Story by Derek Longdon, which as well as being well written, funny and deeply moving proves my point that there is a very important place for humour in a very tragic event.
It has not been a week since this tragedy happened. There are 80,000 people dead so far and this is expected to rise considerably. There are bodies stacked like cord wood on the beach. Parents are still making desperate pleas for any information on 4-year olds torn from their arms by the water. The people are faced with the prospect of diseases such as cholera. This is not one princess in a speeding car, but a tragedy of almost incomprehensible magnitude. I doubt there will ever be a time for humor in the face of this kind of grief and destruction. If there is such a time, it certainly is not here yet.
However, you are entitled to your opinion and no doubt will find those who tell you that you are right. I am not one of them.
My apologies, Eni, for intruding in your LJ in this way, but to say nothing was not possible.
I cannot be bothered with this argument anymore, but will bother to point out that if you want people to read what you have to say it is more useful to reply to their comments instead of randomly posting on the same page.
no subject
Date: 28 Dec 2004 19:12 (UTC)no subject
Date: 28 Dec 2004 22:17 (UTC)Sorry for sharing :-)
no subject
Date: 30 Dec 2004 03:54 (UTC)Maglor
no subject
Date: 30 Dec 2004 10:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: 30 Dec 2004 10:32 (UTC)But I'm dubious about the notion that "humour is misplaced" in tragedies... If I had more time on line I'd think up a coherant argument, but as it s I'll just point out that I'm musing on the old cliche "if you didn't laugh, you'd cry" and while I haven't reached any conclusions in this case most human lives that have been hit by tragedy move on most effectively by the power of laughter - it's long been a coping mechanism for terrible things (hence the horrible need to nervously laugh when finding out people are dead, etc)
I wonder if you've read the book Diana's Story by Derek Longdon, which as well as being well written, funny and deeply moving proves my point that there is a very important place for humour in a very tragic event.
no subject
Date: 30 Dec 2004 13:33 (UTC)However, you are entitled to your opinion and no doubt will find those who tell you that you are right. I am not one of them.
My apologies, Eni, for intruding in your LJ in this way, but to say nothing was not possible.
Maglor
no subject
Date: 30 Dec 2004 21:27 (UTC)I cannot be bothered with this argument anymore, but will bother to point out that if you want people to read what you have to say it is more useful to reply to their comments instead of randomly posting on the same page.