So yes, I did laugh a lot when, walking down Silver Street today, I espied an SUV neatly impaled on one of the rising bollards1. I guess that makes me a bad person...
But it was towing a tractor on a trailer, so it wasn't even like this was some clueless tourist - this person presumably thought they could sneak an SUV with trailer through the bollards without getting caught. I guess they'd been tailgating a taxi.
From where the bollard was located relative to the underside of the car, we reckon that engine is going to be a write-off. Probably an expensive repair bill there!
In other news, I went to Hayley Wood and it was indecently pretty. More later when I've essayed and Chai Latte'd.
1For persons not familar with Cambridge traffic restriction measures, access into many parts of central Cambridge is restricted by rising bollards. These can be lowered if you drive a public transport vehicle with some sort of radio-control in; they lower long enough to let your vehicle through, and then rise up again almost immediately after you have passed. Some sneaky drivers of private vehicles have discovered that if they drive very close behind a taxi, they can sneak through before the bollard pops up again. However, if they misjudge and are not fast enough, it comes up into their engine. Er...yah...
ETA: According to
sonicdrift, the unfortunate driver died as a result of this incident. At this point, I will retract my mocking and be sad. If a rich git with an SUV gets a large repair bill for arrogant stupidity, I laugh. If the rich git loses his/her life, I do not laugh. That's disproportionate punishment. :(
But it was towing a tractor on a trailer, so it wasn't even like this was some clueless tourist - this person presumably thought they could sneak an SUV with trailer through the bollards without getting caught. I guess they'd been tailgating a taxi.
From where the bollard was located relative to the underside of the car, we reckon that engine is going to be a write-off. Probably an expensive repair bill there!
In other news, I went to Hayley Wood and it was indecently pretty. More later when I've essayed and Chai Latte'd.
1For persons not familar with Cambridge traffic restriction measures, access into many parts of central Cambridge is restricted by rising bollards. These can be lowered if you drive a public transport vehicle with some sort of radio-control in; they lower long enough to let your vehicle through, and then rise up again almost immediately after you have passed. Some sneaky drivers of private vehicles have discovered that if they drive very close behind a taxi, they can sneak through before the bollard pops up again. However, if they misjudge and are not fast enough, it comes up into their engine. Er...yah...
ETA: According to
no subject
Date: 15 May 2006 19:22 (UTC)no subject
Date: 15 May 2006 19:41 (UTC)no subject
Date: 15 May 2006 19:25 (UTC)no subject
Date: 15 May 2006 19:40 (UTC)no subject
Date: 15 May 2006 21:46 (UTC)no subject
Date: 15 May 2006 21:52 (UTC)no subject
Date: 15 May 2006 23:45 (UTC)*has never heard about such a thing*
no subject
Date: 15 May 2006 23:51 (UTC)If you are driving over a place where there is a rising bollard, and it starts rising as you go over it (usually because you shouldn't be there), your car gets wrecked!
Cambridge centre has really old, narrow streets that would be incredibly busy, congested and polluted if everyone was allowed in, so the rising bollards exclude all traffic but taxis, police cars and buses.
(Comment reposted as forgot to close tag on first go.)
no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 02:13 (UTC)no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 09:26 (UTC)no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 11:59 (UTC)no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 12:06 (UTC)I look like this (http://edith.freelinuxhost.com/Pre-edited/VernonWedding/slides/IMG_7966.JPG).
no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 12:17 (UTC)no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 10:13 (UTC)no subject
Date: 15 May 2006 22:08 (UTC)no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 06:24 (UTC)Abner
no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 11:24 (UTC)Not at all...
*snigger*
I remember when those things got installed over summer and we had to ring the college to ask how we could get to the car park... they more or less picked up the phone and said "Are you asking about the bollards?"
no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 21:48 (UTC)http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/city/2006/05/16/8ec22332-a9ba-42a1-9de8-4213ea230ca0.lpf
no subject
Date: 16 May 2006 22:22 (UTC)I mean...rich person getting hefty repair bill for stupidity = funny.
Rich person dying = rather less funny.
Eeep! :(
no subject
Date: 17 May 2006 06:29 (UTC)Abner
no subject
Date: 17 May 2006 09:41 (UTC)I don't see why it's funnier because he can afford an expensive car though, or why this automatically makes him a git. He might well have worked hard to be able to buy it and given he's pulling a tractor there's a fair chance it wasn't just being used to take the kids to school.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2006 09:53 (UTC)I would be suspicious that something as large and shiny and new and clean as that was primarily used offroad/in adverse conditions/for towing tractors... but I may be wrong.
Admittedly, I do hate SUVs with a soul-consuming passion.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2006 10:05 (UTC)Abner
no subject
Date: 17 May 2006 10:40 (UTC)My mind missed that *anyone* could be dumb enough to think they could sneak through with a car that long and a trailer so just assumed they missed the signs with very unfortunate timing. Possibly just wishful thinking on the intelligence of mankind.
I'd agree with city based 4x4, but there's a bunch of annoying people running round Cambridge bravely putting anonymous flyers on windscreens telling anyone who has one they're evil.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2006 14:14 (UTC)