*gush*gush*
17 August 2006 11:34Awwww! My widdle Enibrother got his A-level results through today, and he's going to Cambridge!! Following (more or less) in the footsteps of his big ol' sis!
'Binson, watch out!
Now there's the usual media whine over A-level exams getting easier...nearly a quarter of people now get the top A grade on exams. I can see why this might be a complaint - how does that distiguish "the best" from merely "the quite good"? Maybe they should be controversial twerps and do something like the Tripos grading system - the best 10% of students, regardless of their actual mark, get As, the next 30% get Bs, the next 30% Cs, and so on... But I guess for that to work, there has to be a minimum standard over which you cannot fail - it'd be stupid to say the bottom 5% fail regardless of their score if one year half those "failers" got a perfectly respectable score and were just unlucky that others did better... Dunno. Introducing the A* grade at A-level should be useful anyway.
I just wish British exams were less about being taught the bare minimum of syllabus to pass exams and more about teaching as much knowledge as the kids can gobble up.
'Binson, watch out!
Now there's the usual media whine over A-level exams getting easier...nearly a quarter of people now get the top A grade on exams. I can see why this might be a complaint - how does that distiguish "the best" from merely "the quite good"? Maybe they should be controversial twerps and do something like the Tripos grading system - the best 10% of students, regardless of their actual mark, get As, the next 30% get Bs, the next 30% Cs, and so on... But I guess for that to work, there has to be a minimum standard over which you cannot fail - it'd be stupid to say the bottom 5% fail regardless of their score if one year half those "failers" got a perfectly respectable score and were just unlucky that others did better... Dunno. Introducing the A* grade at A-level should be useful anyway.
I just wish British exams were less about being taught the bare minimum of syllabus to pass exams and more about teaching as much knowledge as the kids can gobble up.
no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 10:33 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 12:49 (UTC)I think the AEA's (provided your school offers them) work quite well to catch the top people and distinguish them from the rest...
no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 13:53 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 14:12 (UTC)(FWIW, my school was willing to order me STEP past papers and provide moderate amounts of help such as marking some of my attempts at them. I looked at STEP Maths I, Physics and Chemistry and did Physics and Chemistry (you can only be entered for two)).
no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 14:23 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 21:27 (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2006 10:46 (UTC)When I got my interview at Pembroke one of the questions I was asked (on the pre-interview form) was whether my school offered AEAs and if I was entered for them. I never really knew about STEP, to be honest and presumed it was something just associated with Phys-Sci. As to whether kids are more likely to take such things in private/public schools that may be true, but I think it's just due to awareness, not anything else. Depends how much people want to go for the challenge and just see it as a bit of fun! I admit I failed my only AEA (in Chem)...
Going to the subject of the Scottish Advanced Highers with links to AEAs- I found the first term of Chemistry (and the rest of the course!) tough at Cam, but I have been told that from the point of view of a Scottish student there really wasn't much new, relatively speaking. Now, the stuff we did in that first bit of the course would have allowed anyone to get a very good mark in that AEA... The Scottish system does seem to be better at pushing the bright ones and getting them to think...
no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 17:19 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 17:09 (UTC)If I remember correctly, the way the Tripos results are bellcurved means that you can't be downgraded to a 3rd or a fail (or perhaps it's just fail) if you get above a certain minimum mark, even if everyone gets above that mark. It's annoying me that I now can't remember where I heard this, but I think it was a Chemistry lecturer who ought to have known how the system worked.
Now that the pass-rate is so high, it's not a system that they could introduce for A-levels, though, if it meant a sudden drop in passes from one year to the next. (I'm possibly not the best person to comment, since I did Scottish Advanced Highers, and I'm trying to suppress a rant on that topic.)
no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 17:18 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 17:25 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 17:32 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 Aug 2006 17:43 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Aug 2006 11:24 (UTC)Abner
Yes- I'm back.