Question for LJ
8 January 2009 22:44Our ex-flatmate is the account-holder person named on our phone bills. He is the only person named on the bills.
He has now moved out.
We want to switch the bills to our names and pay them out of our account.
However, my instinct says that BT are not going to be massively helpful if we ring up as non-named persons and try to change a lot of details, including the account holder's name. Odds are they'll want to start a whole new account, with associated faff.
My question for LJ is: what are the odds that we'll find a way to keep our current phone number and not have our phone cut off for however long BT feel like cutting it off for when we try to switch everything over?
(And no, I will not be asking ex-flatmate to sort it. He's a nice bloke, but the only way to make him deal with this kind of thing is to scream at him. He only became the flat's "accountant" because he had a spare bank account to offer up for us to use.)
He has now moved out.
We want to switch the bills to our names and pay them out of our account.
However, my instinct says that BT are not going to be massively helpful if we ring up as non-named persons and try to change a lot of details, including the account holder's name. Odds are they'll want to start a whole new account, with associated faff.
My question for LJ is: what are the odds that we'll find a way to keep our current phone number and not have our phone cut off for however long BT feel like cutting it off for when we try to switch everything over?
(And no, I will not be asking ex-flatmate to sort it. He's a nice bloke, but the only way to make him deal with this kind of thing is to scream at him. He only became the flat's "accountant" because he had a spare bank account to offer up for us to use.)
no subject
Date: 8 Jan 2009 22:57 (UTC)It's a total pain in the ass really.
no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 19:20 (UTC)no subject
Date: 8 Jan 2009 23:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 19:21 (UTC)Re: This is long, sorry!
Date: 9 Jan 2009 19:22 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 00:04 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 19:24 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 09:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 09:08 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 14:21 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 09:12 (UTC)IIRC though when we had our own BT troubles, the amount of time we were actually cut off without a phone wasn't very long. 48 hours I think?
no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 19:27 (UTC)48 hours I can live with! It was weeks and weeks that worried me - getting the phone set up here in the first place was a pain in the butt.
no subject
Date: 10 Jan 2009 07:59 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 14:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 Jan 2009 18:18 (UTC)no subject
Date: 10 Jan 2009 13:12 (UTC)1. The current account holder calls BT, and tells them that he does not want the line any more (there is a technical name for this that I fail at remembering) specifically saying that someone else will be taking over the account.
2. You call BT, give them the number, address etc, and say you want to take over the line. They *will* insist on a monimum 12 month contract.
When I have done this before, we did not have any discontinuity in the phone service. The lines in question did not carry broadband, which complicates matters a lot.
I would check the above with BT customer services before acting on it though, the procedure may be different for residential lines.
Just a warning: with BT, if the line is cancelled to change the name on the account, it will automatically cancel any broadband service on that line.